Brian Martinez ([info]cluebyfour) wrote,
@ 2008-04-30 11:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:business, cars

If gold doesn't work, maybe this will
How to turn $100 million into scrap metal.

This is a symptom of an overly litigious society, I think.  Instead of making a huge insurance claim, Mazda could possibly offset some of the loss by re-selling these cars at a steep discount but without, say, the benefit of a factory warranty.  It seems people are always looking for bargains, but the first time the brakes fail because the master cylinder was compromised will lead to a lawsuit that could cost Mazda a lot more than the loss on scrapping the vehicles (what kind of deductible is there on a policy that will pay a $100 million loss?).  So the company's risk aversion is probably higher than any potential consumers' anyway.

Still it's a little sad to read about nearly 5,000 new cars being ripped apart before they ever see a dealer's lot.  And maybe a bit zen, too:

Next stop: Schnitzer Steel, a salvage yard down on the waterfront that's home to an immense metal grinder. "You turn 7,000-horsepower hammers loose on them, and they're eaten in 10 seconds," says Jamie Wilson, Schnitzer's manager. A bemused smile spreads across his face as another load of Mazdas disappears into its maw.

Moments later, metal shards -- most no bigger than an ashtray -- sprinkle onto a mountain of scrap near Schnitzer's dock. There, a freighter prepares to take the scrap back to Asia where it will get recycled.

Mr. Wilson looks on and concludes: "It'll all probably end up coming back as cars."


(Post a new comment)


[info]agentsteel53
2008-04-30 05:36 pm UTC (link)
d'oh. I was gonna say "resell them to Hollywood", because even if they didn't trust them with the safety of their stunt drivers, the cars would've been well-used as inanimate props (to be eaten by Godzilla, or whatnot)... but nowadays you can do all of that digitally.

send 'em back in time to 1975.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cluebyfour
2008-04-30 05:41 pm UTC (link)
They were indeed approached by the studios about using them as stunt mules. I could see no harm in that, since I'm sure the studios have to waive all liability for the manufacturer, and they often buy the cars used and heavily modify them anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]agentsteel53
2008-04-30 05:44 pm UTC (link)
I would imagine that the price they would have been paid by Hollywood was less than the net insurance payout, counting the premium adjustments and all... I'm figuring this to have come down to an accounting decision that minimised Mazda's loss.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phanatic
2008-04-30 05:57 pm UTC (link)
The problem seems to come from their insurer, who insisted upon the destruction of the vehicles. On one hand, that makes sense: if you're going to compensate someone for a loss, it should be a loss. On the other hand, it's a bit silly; take the money your client got from selling the questionable cars, and deduct that from the compensation you were going to provide. At some point, that'll become more trouble than it's worth, but I'm pretty sure that point's towards the smaller side of the scale than a container ship full of cars.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]akamoe
2008-05-01 05:24 am UTC (link)
Running them out to a TV show is no real guarantee though. I remember that the show `Viper' was filmed locally for awhile about 8-10 years ago, and some of the cars that were supposed to be destroyed at the end of the run were instead pieced together and sold to people who didn't know they'd been seriously damaged in filming...

I also remember moving a series of cars, and taking them from the rail terminal to be destroyed. I don't recall, however, why it was. I just remember having a rep of (unnamed auto co.) riding with me to pick them up and move them.. I probably took about $750,000 worth to the crusher.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…